Різнонаправленість правоохоронної діяльності з протидії злочинності як показник її неефективності

Бочковий, О.В.; Bochkovyi, O.V.

dc.contributor.author	Бочковий, О.В.
dc.contributor.author	Bochkovyi, O.V.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-10T14:05:00Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-10T14:05:00Z
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.identifier.citation	Бочковий О.В. Різнонаправленість правоохоронної діяльності з протидії злочинності як показник її неефективності / О.В. Бочковий // Вісник Луганського державного університету внутрішніх справ. - 2015. - № 4. - С. 136-145	uk_UA
dc.identifier.other	УДК 343.1:351.87:34.096
dc.identifier.uri	http://er.dduvs.edu.ua/handle/123456789/5144
dc.description	The article points to the lack of consistency in law enforcement activities between themselves and between their structural subdivisions to combat crime that has a negative impact on its effectiveness. It is proposed to combine operational and investigative functions, in order to avoid duplication and to increase the interest and motivation of employees of law enforcement bodies. According to Art. 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, the objectives of criminal proceedings is to protect individuals, society and the state from criminal offenses, the protection of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of parties to criminal proceedings, as well as providing a quick, full and impartial investigation and trial, so that everyone who committed a criminal offense, has been prosecuted to the extent of his guilt, no innocent person has been charged or convicted. These objectives are mandatory for all law enforcement officials who are involved in pre-trial investigation. However, various law enforcement agencies at different stages of its use, specific means to carry out their tasks. But despite various means, the goal remains one - to ensure the imposition of a just punishment for the guilty and to avoid the condemnation of an innocent man. However, a thorough familiarity with the legal practice of law enforcement agencies indicates that each instance is so interested in the implementation of its part of the obligations that the main purpose is lost. Carry out its task in isolation from the main goal leads to inefficiency in general. To further complicate the process of identification and investigation of crimes lack of coordination functions of the various bodies and their overlaps. The process of documenting the crimes of the fact that information to the operatives of the indictment signed by the Prosecutor, has a large number of stages, where the information about the crime can be ignored, distorted, removed, etc. depending on the purpose of the unit is presently manufactures. At the same time, inconsistencies in the law enforcement negatively affects the maintenance of the rights and freedoms of citizens. The lack of a unified strategy to achieve the main goal is the suppression of the sense of responsibility of individual workers after their stage of production. This is clearly illustrates the specific character of the work of operational and investigative units, in criminal proceedings. By performing the same work, between an operative and an investigator is constantly confrontation because of vicious legal separation transparent activities of the investigator and operative clandestine activities. We support the idea of creating a police inquiry, that is a combination of operational and investigative activities and the investigation as a whole. Only when the whole process of pre-trial investigation of the information in the preparation of the indictment will carry out one unit or individual will be able not only to achieve the main purpose of criminal proceedings, but greatly simplify and reduce the pre-trial investigation by avoiding duplication, it will be easier to follow the logic and consistency proceedings.	uk_UA
dc.description.abstract	У статті вказано на відсутність узгодженості в діяльності правоохоронних органів між собою, а також між своїми структурними підрозділами щодо протидії злочинності, що негативно позначається на її ефективності. Запропоновано об'єднати оперативні та слідчі функції, щоб уникнути дублювання, а також підвищити зацікавленість і мотивацію працівників правоохоронних органів.	uk_UA
dc.language.iso	other	uk_UA
dc.publisher	Луганський державний університет внутрішніх справ ім. Е.О.Дідоренко	uk_UA
dc.subject	безпека	uk_UA
dc.subject	ефективність	uk_UA
dc.subject	правоохоронна діяльність	uk_UA
dc.subject	протидія	uk_UA
dc.subject	злочинність	uk_UA
dc.subject	права і свободи	uk_UA
dc.subject	оперативно-розшукова діяльність	uk_UA
dc.subject	досудове слідство	uk_UA
dc.subject	прокуратура	uk_UA
dc.subject	суд	uk_UA
dc.subject	security	uk_UA
dc.subject	efficiency	uk_UA
dc.subject	law enforcement	uk_UA
dc.subject	fighting	uk_UA
dc.subject	crime	uk_UA
dc.subject	rights and freedoms	uk_UA
dc.subject	operatively-search activity	uk_UA
dc.subject	pre-trial investigation	uk_UA
dc.subject	the prosecutor's office	uk_UA
dc.subject	court	uk_UA
dc.title	Різнонаправленість правоохоронної діяльності з протидії злочинності як показник її неефективності	uk_UA
dc.title.alternative	Different directions of law enforcement in combating crime as an indicator of its ineffectiveness	uk_UA
dc.type	Article	uk_UA