Короткий опис(реферат):
Розглянуто особливості класифікації сімейно-правових договорів. Зазначено, що
традиційний розподіл сімейно-правових договорів на поіменовані та непоіменовані зумовлений
особливостями співвідношення сімейного та цивільного законодавства з принципом свободи
договору. Акцентовано увагу на застосуванні загальної теорії договору в сімейному праві з
причини недостатньої розробленості, тому і відокремлення критеріїв розмежування останніх
відповідно до положень цивілістичної науки.
Проаналізовано основні наукові підходи щодо класифікації сімейно-правових договорів,
а також сформовано та запропоновано критерії щодо розмежування останніх. The article examines the
peculiarities of the classification of family law contracts. The main scientific approaches to the
classification of family law contracts are analyzed, as well as the criteria for distinguishing the latter are
formed and proposed. It is noted that the traditional division of family law contracts into named and
unnamed is determined by the peculiarities of the relationship between family and civil legislation and the
principle of freedom of contract.
The author focuses attention on the application of the general theory of the contract in family law
due to insufficient development, therefore, the separation of the criteria for distinguishing the latter in
accordance with the provisions of civil science, currently defined as optimal and permissible. This
testifies to the peculiarities of family-legal relations and the existence of its own target priorities in this
area. The author draws attention to the «established civil criteria», which must definitely take into account
the peculiarities of relations in the field of family law. It was determined that the independent nature of
the classification of contracts in the family sphere is due to the peculiarities of their enforcement in
practice.
It is noted that in the doctrine of family law there are many approaches and criteria for the
classification and delimitation of family law contracts, which complicates the procedure for their
conclusion, certification and execution. The author focuses on the fact that the mentioned approaches to
the classification of family law contracts are somewhat rudimentary and do not correspond to the modern
trend of the development of family and civil law.
It is argued that family legislation in general is characterized by a weak development of contractual
structures, which cannot but be reflected in law enforcement practice. The use of contractual models of
civil law can be applied only partially with mandatory consideration of the peculiarities of family legal
relations. The author suggests establishing at the legislative level uniform criteria for the classification of
family law contracts, as this is necessary for the practical application of family contractual structures.
