Короткий опис(реферат):
Проаналізовано систему знань про конфліктологію як науку, її становлення та сучасний
стан, а також практичні навички продуктивного вирішення конфліктів та подолання конфліктних
ситуацій при проведенні слідчих дій, зокрема допиту. Розглянуто класифікацію, динаміку
розвитку та причини виникнення конфліктів, методи ефективного управління ними. Акцентовано
на відмінності поняття допиту з точки зору кримінального процесу та криміналістики та в аспекті
психології. Окрему увагу приділено психологічним особливостям взаємодії та допиту
неповнолітніх із проблемами у спілкуванні. Розроблено деякі стратегії подолання конфліктних
ситуацій при проведенні слідчих дій. The article analyzes the system of knowledge about conflictology as a science,
investigates its formation and the current state of this discipline. Practical skills of productive conflict
resolution and overcoming conflict situations during investigative actions and interrogation, in particular,
were analyzed. The classification, dynamics of development and causes of conflicts were considered, and
the methods of their effective management were analyzed. Attention was drawn to the difference between
the concept of "interrogation" from the point of view of the criminal process and criminology and from
the point of view of psychology.
Psychological features of interaction and interrogation of minors with communication problems
were separately considered. Developed some strategies for overcoming conflict situations during
investigative actions. In a conflict situation, the investigator can use such techniques as persuasion,
interrogation with the presentation of evidence, creating an exaggerated idea of the investigator’s
knowledge, the assumption of a legend, consistency, the method of indirect interrogation, surprise,
speeding up the pace of interrogation, and demonstrating the capabilities of the investigation. Thus, the
investigator must carefully prepare for the interrogation, analyze the evidence available in the case against
the accused or suspect and the explanations that they have already given; be especially observant during
the interrogation of the nuances of the interrogated person’s behavior, his/her reaction to certain
questions, his calmness or irritability, confidence or fear, facial expressions and gestures. Moreover, the
investigator must remain calm, attentive and confident, since the effectiveness of the interrogation
depends, first of all, not on a specific tactical technique or combination, but on the literacy and experience
of the investigator using them.
