Abstract:
У науковій статті досліджено особливості реалізації права на ефективний засіб
юридичного захисту в Україні та Болгарії. Виконано компаративістичний аналіз з метою
виявлення проблемних аспектів реалізації цього права та позитивних сторін його запровадження в
правозахисну систему та кримінальну юстицію. Розглянуто найбільш поширені засоби
юридичного захисту, які за низкою ознак повинні бути ефективними для захисту особами своїх
прав і свобод на досудовому провадженні в кримінальному процесі.
Description:
The scientific article
examines the peculiarities of the realization of the right to an effective means of legal protection in
Ukraine and Bulgaria. A comparative analysis was conducted in order to identify problematic aspects of
the implementation of this right and the positive aspects of its introduction into the human rights system
and criminal justice. The most common means of legal protection, which according to a number of
characteristics should be effective for individuals to protect their rights and freedoms in pre-trial
proceedings in a criminal process, are considered.
The requirement to establish the validity of a criminal charge within a reasonable time is a key
element of the right to a fair trial, which is guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention. Ensuring
this right, which involves avoiding undue delay, has implications for many aspects of the organization of
the criminal justice system, including the procedures to be followed, the powers available, the
institutional arrangements in place, the technologies used and the resources provided. However, even if
all these aspects are generally satisfactory, there is always the possibility of unjustified non-observance of
procedural deadlines during criminal proceedings in a separate case. Thus, the right to an effective
remedy must be available either as a means of prevention or as a means of redress.
