Короткий опис(реферат):
Здійснено аналіз основних проблем, пов'язаних із розслідуванням згвалтувань на
деокупованих територіях України. Наразі існує велика кількість суб'єктів розслідування, серед
яких відсутній розподіл повноважень і узгодженість дій. Також однією з проблем, на яку автор
звернув увагу, є специфічний спосіб доказування, що порівнюється із розслідуванням злочинів
минулих років. Особливістю розслідування згвалтувань на деокупованих територіях є перевага
непрямих доказів, що обумовлюється відсутністю слідової картини. Пропонується
використовувати закордонний досвід, а також запровадити проведення антропологічної
експертизи як комплексної експертизи, доповнюючої ДНК-дослідження. The article
provides an analysis of the main problems related to the investigation of rapes in the de-occupied
territories of Ukraine. Among the problems identified by the author is the multiplicity of subjects of the
investigation, among which there is no distribution of powers and coordination of actions. Also, one of
the problems that the author drew attention to is the specific method of proof, which is compared with the
investigation of crimes of the past years. The peculiarity of the investigation of rapes in the de-occupied
territories is the superiority of indirect evidence, which is caused by the absence of a trace picture. It is
proposed to use foreign experience, as well as to introduce the conduct of anthropological examination as
a comprehensive examination, supplementing other studies.
One of the problems associated with the investigation of rapes, the author calls the multiplicity
of the subjects of the investigation. In this regard, there is a lack of coordinated activity between the
groups, a lack of a regulatory framework for delimiting the powers of each of the groups, a lack of a
system of interaction between groups of investigation subjects, and a mixed jurisdiction, that is, rape is
investigated as a violation of both domestic and international legislation.
Rapes in the liberated territories can be investigated according to the principle of crimes of past
years, based on a similar trace picture. But there are certain differences: the process of establishing the
truth is complicated by the commission of crimes by a citizen of another state, the death of such a person
as a result of military operations, the death of the victim, and the absence of any evidence that would
testify to the involvement of a specific person in the commission of a crime.
The author indicated that the places where the rapes were committed are mostly the places of
residence of the victims near the places of temporary deployment of Russian troops. Also, such places are
places of forced illegal detention: basements, office premises, apartments, private houses. Such places can
be points organization places or filtering places.
