Плюралізм підходів до визначення кількісного аспекту стадій правозастосовного процесу

Abstract

Розглянуто існуючі в сучасній правничій науці погляди правників на кількісний аспект стадій процесу застосування норм права. На основі їх аналізу обґрунтовано теоретичну модель, що визначає алгоритм дій уповноваженої сторони управлінських правовідносин, спрямованих на досягнення проміжних цілей, і як наслідок – кінцевої мети правозастосовного процесу.

Processing this article the author put an aim to ground a theoretical model determining the scheme of actions of the authorized party of administrative relations directed at attaining interim aims and as a result the final aim of law enforcement process. The issue of staging of the process of legal norms enforcement was viewed by the author within the traditional for the theory of law approach, from the point of view of general and logical description. Scientists’ views analysis towards the quantitative aspect of interim aims of the process of enforcement of legal norms gives the grounds for conclusion that their different stroke is recognition as independent and significant of the following stages: 1) clarification of sense of a legal norm; 2) legal norms interpretation; 3) designing of the approved decision in law enforcement act; 4) proving the contents of decision for the record of the addressee of law enforcement, interested persons and organizations; 5) securing fulfillment of the approved law enforcement act. The author gives arguments and counterarguments towards recognition as independent and significant of the mentioned stages of law enforcement process. Considering these arguments the theoretical model determining the scheme of acts of the authorized party of administrative legal relations directed at achievement of interim aim and as a result the final aim of law enforcement process should include the following stages: 1) ascertainment of the factual circumstances of a case; 2) ascertainment of a legal base of a case (legal qualification); 3) official casual interpretation of a legal norm being subjected to application; 4) case disposal as a matter of fact by way of resolving of an appropriate decision (law enforcement act) and its documental design if such a form is a claim of the acting legislation; 5) securing of the approved decision accomplishment